The Guardian in London has a story that, in a way, is a repply to the article printed in the Telegraph that I commented on yesterday. They say that the Telegraph article proves nothing about a potential link between Iraq and al-Qa'ida. One would assume that the the Telegraph isn't full of shit, which I don't, but even if their article is accurate, the Guardian has this to say in reply:"'We are aware of fleeting contacts [between Baghdad and al-Qaida] in the past, but there were were no long-term official contacts,' a well-placed source told the Guardian yesterday. 'The documents do not take things further forward.'"

Meanwhile, the Telegraph printed the entire contents of the supposed papers they found. While if true, it proves that Iraq was trying to form a relationship wth bin Laden, they do not prove that one exists.