More email to assholes
I wrote this letter to John Hawkins of Right Wing News, in reference to a column he wrote in which he lied. I expect to never receive a reply.
Subject: Backing a liar
I always find it rather funny how liars stick together. I certainly hope that you don't consider yourself to be anything other than a government propagandist, especially after reading your column titled, "Rewriting History To Attack Bush On Iraq".
I thought this was the best part: "But like the other "scandals" the Dems have tried to cook up since Bush came into office, this one has very little to it. In short, the CIA gave Bush a piece of intelligence info and told him it was genuine, Bush shared it with the American people, then the administration was told it was bogus, and they later told the American people about it. Had the CIA done a better job of keeping the President informed of what they knew, it would have never made the SOTU speech in the first place."
Do you actually believe the bullshit that you write, or are you just paid off by Karl Rove? Anyone and their mother knows that this is false, and that, yes, Bush was lying.
Just check a recent story in London's Independent
(http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=422942).
This article is about Joseph Wilson, the diplomat who was sent to Niger at the request of Vice President Dick Cheney in March, 2002. He was sent by the CIA.
The report he handed in proved that the claims were falsified. The article goes on to mention that Mr. Wilson was debriefed by the CIA *AND* the State Department. TOp officials at the CIA have assured Mr. Wilson that his report went to the highest levels of US and British governments.
Yet, somehow, the claim ended up in Bush's SOTU because it was listed on a "fact sheet" from the State Department.
Yes, John, I know you don't want to hear it, but Bush lied. He knew he was lying, and he purposely used this lie to make a case for war. Just like Bush has lied about Iraq/al-Qa'ida connections, just like Bush lied about dumping Harken stock, just like Bush lied about his relationship with Kenny Boy Lay, and just like Bush lied before the election about his criminal record. These were all lies, lies that Bush knowingly told the American public. Bush lied on purpose to Americans in an attempt to make sure his reputation was clean, and no we know that Bush lied on purpose as an excuse to goto war. With a history of dishonesty, it was only a matter of time before the public caught onto his act.
This, John, is shameful. The fact that you uphold his administration goes to show me, and the rest of us who read your trash and know what you are omitting from your columns, that birds of a feather stick together. I guess it's too much to wish that you would use your writing "talents", or the bandwidth and audience that your site gets, to show concern for how the executive branch is operating, and whether or not they are lying to the American People.
Unfortunately John, you have shown that you are too partisan for this. You would much rather lie about Bush's lies then care about whether your government is honest to your neighbors. Shame on you.
And if you do reply, please refrain from quoting Democrats to support your agruments. I'm a member of the Green Party.
-adam
http://loadedmouth.com
<< Home