I'm not sure if this counts as lying or incompetence
Maybe a little bit of both, I'm not sure. My bias leans towards the former, but since these people are so stupid it could be the latter. Either way and either reason, this is a good example of how the Republican media just can't get their facts straight.
For some personal amusement tonight, I took a look at World Net Daily's headlines. The very first headline, printed in a large font above the masthead, said: "WND most popular 'political site'." Under this, as if to show how important tooting their own horn is, you had to click "WND Exclusive" to read it.
The subline of the article reads, "Alexa ranks it No. 1 spot for election coverage." I'm not sure of WND is attempting to set a record for the speed in which it took them to lie, (they probably already own such a record), but they have achieved the dubious task of fibbing before their article even gets to the first paragraph. To their credit, they get it right in the first paragraph:
WorldNetDaily.com is ranked as the No. 1 most popular political site on the Internet, according to Alexa.com
WND founder Joseph Farah chimes in, get a load of his thoughts:
"But it's [the ranking] even more thrilling because we've never considered WND primarily a political site. It is first and foremost a newssite ? the largest independent, full-service newssite in the world."
Read that again and try not to laugh. How can anyone, much less the founder, not consider WND to be a political site? How? Given their highly political and not exactly "independent" content, this just defies logic. The founder of WND basically just came out and admitted to being delusional. It's great to know that delusional men are running popular media sites. And just how does one define "independent?" Just like CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and other non-independent media outlets, WND depends upon advertising to stay in business. When doing proper comparisans against their proper competition, it becomes glaringly obvious that WND just isn't independent. Worse yet, at least other services, including Fox News, make an attempt to tell multiple sides of a story, but WND has thirves off their biases and proudly let them show.
The basis for Farah's quote comes from this link, where Alexa has them ranked as the number one political site. Alexa has has rankings for news sites, and WND isn't even close to cracking the top 5.
But hey, when you're already lying, why stop? Here's the final paragraph of the article:
WND also is ranked No. 1 in Alexa's News and Media category, followed by NewsMax, National Review Online, FrontPage Magazine and the Weekly Standard.
This paragraph should cause even the most hardened WND reader to raise an eyebrow, because it just said that WND is the number one News and Media site, followed by 4 other sites which lean to the right. "News and Media," that's a rather broad topic, can it really be completely dominated by right wing hitmen?
When you click on the link WND provides, you find the part of the story they left out: they rank number one in "News and Media" under Conservatism.
The real story isn't how popular WND is, it's how can WND be so popular when they fuck up simple stories like this? Maybe it would be more accurate of WND had a new headline for this story, "We're the most popular bunch of liars on the web!"
On another topic, I originally visited WND for my personal amusement, and I must say that their polls have been lacking lately. The questions aren't as amusing, and the multiple yes/no with description answers haven't been as ridiculous. I guess quality is dropping all across the board over at WND.
While I'm on the topic of honesty in journalism, I have to admit that I have a link to WND on this site because, even though I'm very biased, I attempt to give my links some balance. But given the fact that WND can't even get a simple story like this straight, I'm removing them from my "News" links. They don't even attempt to publish anything accurate, they just churn out what garbage comes to their mind. Sorry, but that's not news.